Measurement-Induced State Transitions in a Superconducting Qubit: Within the Rotating Wave Approximation

  1. Mostafa Khezri,
  2. Alex Opremcak,
  3. Zijun Chen,
  4. Andreas Bengtsson,
  5. Theodore White,
  6. Ofer Naaman,
  7. Rajeev Acharya,
  8. Kyle Anderson,
  9. Markus Ansmann,
  10. Frank Arute,
  11. Kunal Arya,
  12. Abraham Asfaw,
  13. Joseph C Bardin,
  14. Alexandre Bourassa,
  15. Jenna Bovaird,
  16. Leon Brill,
  17. Bob B. Buckley,
  18. David A. Buell,
  19. Tim Burger,
  20. Brian Burkett,
  21. Nicholas Bushnell,
  22. Juan Campero,
  23. Ben Chiaro,
  24. Roberto Collins,
  25. Alexander L. Crook,
  26. Ben Curtin,
  27. Sean Demura,
  28. Andrew Dunsworth,
  29. Catherine Erickson,
  30. Reza Fatemi,
  31. Vinicius S. Ferreira,
  32. Leslie Flores-Burgos,
  33. Ebrahim Forati,
  34. Brooks Foxen,
  35. Gonzalo Garcia,
  36. William Giang,
  37. Marissa Giustina,
  38. Raja Gosula,
  39. Alejandro Grajales Dau,
  40. Michael C. Hamilton,
  41. Sean D. Harrington,
  42. Paula Heu,
  43. Jeremy Hilton,
  44. Markus R. Hoffmann,
  45. Sabrina Hong,
  46. Trent Huang,
  47. Ashley Huff,
  48. Justin Iveland,
  49. Evan Jeffrey,
  50. Julian Kelly,
  51. Seon Kim,
  52. Paul V. Klimov,
  53. Fedor Kostritsa,
  54. John Mark Kreikebaum,
  55. David Landhuis,
  56. Pavel Laptev,
  57. Lily Laws,
  58. Kenny Lee,
  59. Brian J. Lester,
  60. Alexander T. Lill,
  61. Wayne Liu,
  62. Aditya Locharla,
  63. Erik Lucero,
  64. Steven Martin,
  65. Matt McEwen,
  66. Anthony Megrant,
  67. Xiao Mi,
  68. Kevin C. Miao,
  69. Shirin Montazeri,
  70. Alexis Morvan,
  71. Matthew Neeley,
  72. Charles Neill,
  73. Ani Nersisyan,
  74. Jiun How Ng,
  75. Anthony Nguyen,
  76. Murray Nguyen,
  77. Rebecca Potter,
  78. Chris Quintana,
  79. Charles Rocque,
  80. Pedram Roushan,
  81. Kannan Sankaragomathi,
  82. Kevin J. Satzinger,
  83. Christopher Schuster,
  84. Michael J. Shearn,
  85. Aaron Shorter,
  86. Vladimir Shvarts,
  87. Jindra Skruzny,
  88. W. Clarke Smith,
  89. George Sterling,
  90. Marco Szalay,
  91. Douglas Thor,
  92. Alfredo Torres,
  93. Bryan W. K. Woo,
  94. Z. Jamie Yao,
  95. Ping Yeh,
  96. Juhwan Yoo,
  97. Grayson Young,
  98. Ningfeng Zhu,
  99. Nicholas Zobrist,
  100. and Daniel Sank
Superconducting qubits typically use a dispersive readout scheme, where a resonator is coupled to a qubit such that its frequency is qubit-state dependent. Measurement is performed
by driving the resonator, where the transmitted resonator field yields information about the resonator frequency and thus the qubit state. Ideally, we could use arbitrarily strong resonator drives to achieve a target signal-to-noise ratio in the shortest possible time. However, experiments have shown that when the average resonator photon number exceeds a certain threshold, the qubit is excited out of its computational subspace, which we refer to as a measurement-induced state transition. These transitions degrade readout fidelity, and constitute leakage which precludes further operation of the qubit in, for example, error correction. Here we study these transitions using a transmon qubit by experimentally measuring their dependence on qubit frequency, average photon number, and qubit state, in the regime where the resonator frequency is lower than the qubit frequency. We observe signatures of resonant transitions between levels in the coupled qubit-resonator system that exhibit noisy behavior when measured repeatedly in time. We provide a semi-classical model of these transitions based on the rotating wave approximation and use it to predict the onset of state transitions in our experiments. Our results suggest the transmon is excited to levels near the top of its cosine potential following a state transition, where the charge dispersion of higher transmon levels explains the observed noisy behavior of state transitions. Moreover, occupation in these higher energy levels poses a major challenge for fast qubit reset.

Readout of a quantum processor with high dynamic range Josephson parametric amplifiers

  1. T. C. White,
  2. Alex Opremcak,
  3. George Sterling,
  4. Alexander Korotkov,
  5. Daniel Sank,
  6. Rajeev Acharya,
  7. Markus Ansmann,
  8. Frank Arute,
  9. Kunal Arya,
  10. Joseph C Bardin,
  11. Andreas Bengtsson,
  12. Alexandre Bourassa,
  13. Jenna Bovaird,
  14. Leon Brill,
  15. Bob B. Buckley,
  16. David A. Buell,
  17. Tim Burger,
  18. Brian Burkett,
  19. Nicholas Bushnell,
  20. Zijun Chen,
  21. Ben Chiaro,
  22. Josh Cogan,
  23. Roberto Collins,
  24. Alexander L. Crook,
  25. Ben Curtin,
  26. Sean Demura,
  27. Andrew Dunsworth,
  28. Catherine Erickson,
  29. Reza Fatemi,
  30. Leslie Flores-Burgos,
  31. Ebrahim Forati,
  32. Brooks Foxen,
  33. William Giang,
  34. Marissa Giustina,
  35. Alejandro Grajales Dau,
  36. Michael C. Hamilton,
  37. Sean D. Harrington,
  38. Jeremy Hilton,
  39. Markus Hoffmann,
  40. Sabrina Hong,
  41. Trent Huang,
  42. Ashley Huff,
  43. Justin Iveland,
  44. Evan Jeffrey,
  45. Mária Kieferová,
  46. Seon Kim,
  47. Paul V. Klimov,
  48. Fedor Kostritsa,
  49. John Mark Kreikebaum,
  50. David Landhuis,
  51. Pavel Laptev,
  52. Lily Laws,
  53. Kenny Lee,
  54. Brian J. Lester,
  55. Alexander Lill,
  56. Wayne Liu,
  57. Aditya Locharla,
  58. Erik Lucero,
  59. Trevor McCourt,
  60. Matt McEwen,
  61. Xiao Mi,
  62. Kevin C. Miao,
  63. Shirin Montazeri,
  64. Alexis Morvan,
  65. Matthew Neeley,
  66. Charles Neill,
  67. Ani Nersisyan,
  68. Jiun How Ng,
  69. Anthony Nguyen,
  70. Murray Nguyen,
  71. Rebecca Potter,
  72. Chris Quintana,
  73. Pedram Roushan,
  74. Kannan Sankaragomathi,
  75. Kevin J. Satzinger,
  76. Christopher Schuster,
  77. Michael J. Shearn,
  78. Aaron Shorter,
  79. Vladimir Shvarts,
  80. Jindra Skruzny,
  81. W. Clarke Smith,
  82. Marco Szalay,
  83. Alfredo Torres,
  84. Bryan Woo,
  85. Z. Jamie Yao,
  86. Ping Yeh,
  87. Juhwan Yoo,
  88. Grayson Young,
  89. Ningfeng Zhu,
  90. Nicholas Zobrist,
  91. Yu Chen,
  92. Anthony Megrant,
  93. Julian Kelly,
  94. and Ofer Naaman
We demonstrate a high dynamic range Josephson parametric amplifier (JPA) in which the active nonlinear element is implemented using an array of rf-SQUIDs. The device is matched to the
50 Ω environment with a Klopfenstein-taper impedance transformer and achieves a bandwidth of 250-300 MHz, with input saturation powers up to -95 dBm at 20 dB gain. A 54-qubit Sycamore processor was used to benchmark these devices, providing a calibration for readout power, an estimate of amplifier added noise, and a platform for comparison against standard impedance matched parametric amplifiers with a single dc-SQUID. We find that the high power rf-SQUID array design has no adverse effect on system noise, readout fidelity, or qubit dephasing, and we estimate an upper bound on amplifier added noise at 1.6 times the quantum limit. Lastly, amplifiers with this design show no degradation in readout fidelity due to gain compression, which can occur in multi-tone multiplexed readout with traditional JPAs.

Simple coplanar waveguide resonator mask targeting metal-substrate interface

  1. Cameron J. Kopas,
  2. Ella Lachman,
  3. Corey Rae H McRae,
  4. Yuvraj Mohan,
  5. Josh Y. Mutus,
  6. Ani Nersisyan,
  7. and Amrit Poudel
This white paper presents a single-layer mask, found at this https URL. It is designed for fabrication of superconducting microwave resonators towards 1:1 comparisons of dielectric
losses from the metal-substrate interface. Finite-element electromagnetic simulations are used to determine participation ratios of the four major regions of the on-chip devices, as well as to confirm lack of crosstalk between neighboring devices and demonstrate coupling tunability over three orders of magnitude. This mask is intended as an open-source community resource for facilitating precise and accurate comparisons of materials in the single-photon, millikelvin regime.

Entanglement Across Separate Silicon Dies in a Modular Superconducting Qubit Device

  1. Alysson Gold,
  2. JP Paquette,
  3. Anna Stockklauser,
  4. Matthew J. Reagor,
  5. M. Sohaib Alam,
  6. Andrew Bestwick,
  7. Nicolas Didier,
  8. Ani Nersisyan,
  9. Feyza Oruc,
  10. Armin Razavi,
  11. Ben Scharmann,
  12. Eyob A. Sete,
  13. Biswajit Sur,
  14. Davide Venturelli,
  15. Cody James Winkleblack,
  16. Filip Wudarski,
  17. Mike Harburn,
  18. and Chad Rigetti
Assembling future large-scale quantum computers out of smaller, specialized modules promises to simplify a number of formidable science and engineering challenges. One of the primary
challenges in developing a modular architecture is in engineering high fidelity, low-latency quantum interconnects between modules. Here we demonstrate a modular solid state architecture with deterministic inter-module coupling between four physically separate, interchangeable superconducting qubit integrated circuits, achieving two-qubit gate fidelities as high as 99.1±0.5\% and 98.3±0.3\% for iSWAP and CZ entangling gates, respectively. The quality of the inter-module entanglement is further confirmed by a demonstration of Bell-inequality violation for disjoint pairs of entangled qubits across the four separate silicon dies. Having proven out the fundamental building blocks, this work provides the technological foundations for a modular quantum processor: technology which will accelerate near-term experimental efforts and open up new paths to the fault-tolerant era for solid state qubit architectures.

Realization of a Carbon-Nanotube-Based Superconducting Qubit

  1. Matthias Mergenthaler,
  2. Ani Nersisyan,
  3. Andrew Patterson,
  4. Martina Esposito,
  5. Andreas Baumgartner,
  6. Christian Schönenberger,
  7. G. Andrew D. Briggs,
  8. Edward A. Laird,
  9. and Peter J. Leek
Hybrid circuit quantum electrodynamics (QED) involves the study of coherent quantum physics in solid state systems via their interactions with superconducting microwave circuits. Here
we present an implementation of a hybrid superconducting qubit that employs a carbon nanotube as a Josephson junction. We realize the junction by contacting a carbon nanotube with a superconducting Pd/Al bi-layer, and implement voltage tunability of the qubit frequency using a local electrostatic gate. We demonstrate strong dispersive coupling to a coplanar waveguide resonator via observation of a resonator frequency shift dependent on applied gate voltage. We extract qubit parameters from spectroscopy using dispersive readout and find qubit relaxation and coherence times in the range of 10−200 ns.

Manufacturing low dissipation superconducting quantum processors

  1. Ani Nersisyan,
  2. Stefano Poletto,
  3. Nasser Alidoust,
  4. Riccardo Manenti,
  5. Russ Renzas,
  6. Cat-Vu Bui,
  7. Kim Vu,
  8. Tyler Whyland,
  9. Yuvraj Mohan,
  10. Eyob A. Sete,
  11. Sam Stanwyck,
  12. Andrew Bestwick,
  13. and Matthew Reagor
Enabling applications for solid state quantum technology will require systematically reducing noise, particularly dissipation, in these systems. Yet, when multiple decay channels are
present in a system with similar weight, resolution to distinguish relatively small changes is necessary to infer improvements to noise levels. For superconducting qubits, uncontrolled variation of nominal performance makes obtaining such resolution challenging. Here, we approach this problem by investigating specific combinations of previously reported fabrication techniques on the quality of 242 thin film superconducting resonators and qubits. Our results quantify the influence of elementary processes on dissipation at key interfaces. We report that an end-to-end optimization of the manufacturing process that integrates multiple small improvements together can produce an average T¯¯¯¯1=76±13 μs across 24 qubits with the best qubits having T1≥110 μs. Moreover, our analysis places bounds on energy decay rates for three fabrication-related loss channels present in state-of-the-art superconducting qubits. Understanding dissipation through such systematic analysis may pave the way for lower noise solid state quantum computers.