Resisting high-energy impact events through gap engineering in superconducting qubit arrays

  1. Matt McEwen,
  2. Kevin C. Miao,
  3. Juan Atalaya,
  4. Alex Bilmes,
  5. Alex Crook,
  6. Jenna Bovaird,
  7. John Mark Kreikebaum,
  8. Nicholas Zobrist,
  9. Evan Jeffrey,
  10. Bicheng Ying,
  11. Andreas Bengtsson,
  12. Hung-Shen Chang,
  13. Andrew Dunsworth,
  14. Julian Kelly,
  15. Yaxing Zhang,
  16. Ebrahim Forati,
  17. Rajeev Acharya,
  18. Justin Iveland,
  19. Wayne Liu,
  20. Seon Kim,
  21. Brian Burkett,
  22. Anthony Megrant,
  23. Yu Chen,
  24. Charles Neill,
  25. Daniel Sank,
  26. Michel Devoret,
  27. and Alex Opremcak
Quantum error correction (QEC) provides a practical path to fault-tolerant quantum computing through scaling to large qubit numbers, assuming that physical errors are sufficiently uncorrelated
in time and space. In superconducting qubit arrays, high-energy impact events produce correlated errors, violating this key assumption. Following such an event, phonons with energy above the superconducting gap propagate throughout the device substrate, which in turn generate a temporary surge in quasiparticle (QP) density throughout the array. When these QPs tunnel across the qubits‘ Josephson junctions, they induce correlated errors. Engineering different superconducting gaps across the qubit’s Josephson junctions provides a method to resist this form of QP tunneling. By fabricating all-aluminum transmon qubits with both strong and weak gap engineering on the same substrate, we observe starkly different responses during high-energy impact events. Strongly gap engineered qubits do not show any degradation in T1 during impact events, while weakly gap engineered qubits show events of correlated degradation in T1. We also show that strongly gap engineered qubits are robust to QP poisoning from increasing optical illumination intensity, whereas weakly gap engineered qubits display rapid degradation in coherence. Based on these results, gap engineering removes the threat of high-energy impacts to QEC in superconducting qubit arrays.

Optimizing quantum gates towards the scale of logical qubits

  1. Paul V. Klimov,
  2. Andreas Bengtsson,
  3. Chris Quintana,
  4. Alexandre Bourassa,
  5. Sabrina Hong,
  6. Andrew Dunsworth,
  7. Kevin J. Satzinger,
  8. William P. Livingston,
  9. Volodymyr Sivak,
  10. Murphy Y. Niu,
  11. Trond I. Andersen,
  12. Yaxing Zhang,
  13. Desmond Chik,
  14. Zijun Chen,
  15. Charles Neill,
  16. Catherine Erickson,
  17. Alejandro Grajales Dau,
  18. Anthony Megrant,
  19. Pedram Roushan,
  20. Alexander N. Korotkov,
  21. Julian Kelly,
  22. Vadim Smelyanskiy,
  23. Yu Chen,
  24. and Hartmut Neven
A foundational assumption of quantum error correction theory is that quantum gates can be scaled to large processors without exceeding the error-threshold for fault tolerance. Two major
challenges that could become fundamental roadblocks are manufacturing high performance quantum hardware and engineering a control system that can reach its performance limits. The control challenge of scaling quantum gates from small to large processors without degrading performance often maps to non-convex, high-constraint, and time-dependent control optimization over an exponentially expanding configuration space. Here we report on a control optimization strategy that can scalably overcome the complexity of such problems. We demonstrate it by choreographing the frequency trajectories of 68 frequency-tunable superconducting qubits to execute single- and two-qubit gates while mitigating computational errors. When combined with a comprehensive model of physical errors across our processor, the strategy suppresses physical error rates by ∼3.7× compared with the case of no optimization. Furthermore, it is projected to achieve a similar performance advantage on a distance-23 surface code logical qubit with 1057 physical qubits. Our control optimization strategy solves a generic scaling challenge in a way that can be adapted to other quantum algorithms, operations, and computing architectures.

Readout of a quantum processor with high dynamic range Josephson parametric amplifiers

  1. T. C. White,
  2. Alex Opremcak,
  3. George Sterling,
  4. Alexander Korotkov,
  5. Daniel Sank,
  6. Rajeev Acharya,
  7. Markus Ansmann,
  8. Frank Arute,
  9. Kunal Arya,
  10. Joseph C Bardin,
  11. Andreas Bengtsson,
  12. Alexandre Bourassa,
  13. Jenna Bovaird,
  14. Leon Brill,
  15. Bob B. Buckley,
  16. David A. Buell,
  17. Tim Burger,
  18. Brian Burkett,
  19. Nicholas Bushnell,
  20. Zijun Chen,
  21. Ben Chiaro,
  22. Josh Cogan,
  23. Roberto Collins,
  24. Alexander L. Crook,
  25. Ben Curtin,
  26. Sean Demura,
  27. Andrew Dunsworth,
  28. Catherine Erickson,
  29. Reza Fatemi,
  30. Leslie Flores-Burgos,
  31. Ebrahim Forati,
  32. Brooks Foxen,
  33. William Giang,
  34. Marissa Giustina,
  35. Alejandro Grajales Dau,
  36. Michael C. Hamilton,
  37. Sean D. Harrington,
  38. Jeremy Hilton,
  39. Markus Hoffmann,
  40. Sabrina Hong,
  41. Trent Huang,
  42. Ashley Huff,
  43. Justin Iveland,
  44. Evan Jeffrey,
  45. Mária Kieferová,
  46. Seon Kim,
  47. Paul V. Klimov,
  48. Fedor Kostritsa,
  49. John Mark Kreikebaum,
  50. David Landhuis,
  51. Pavel Laptev,
  52. Lily Laws,
  53. Kenny Lee,
  54. Brian J. Lester,
  55. Alexander Lill,
  56. Wayne Liu,
  57. Aditya Locharla,
  58. Erik Lucero,
  59. Trevor McCourt,
  60. Matt McEwen,
  61. Xiao Mi,
  62. Kevin C. Miao,
  63. Shirin Montazeri,
  64. Alexis Morvan,
  65. Matthew Neeley,
  66. Charles Neill,
  67. Ani Nersisyan,
  68. Jiun How Ng,
  69. Anthony Nguyen,
  70. Murray Nguyen,
  71. Rebecca Potter,
  72. Chris Quintana,
  73. Pedram Roushan,
  74. Kannan Sankaragomathi,
  75. Kevin J. Satzinger,
  76. Christopher Schuster,
  77. Michael J. Shearn,
  78. Aaron Shorter,
  79. Vladimir Shvarts,
  80. Jindra Skruzny,
  81. W. Clarke Smith,
  82. Marco Szalay,
  83. Alfredo Torres,
  84. Bryan Woo,
  85. Z. Jamie Yao,
  86. Ping Yeh,
  87. Juhwan Yoo,
  88. Grayson Young,
  89. Ningfeng Zhu,
  90. Nicholas Zobrist,
  91. Yu Chen,
  92. Anthony Megrant,
  93. Julian Kelly,
  94. and Ofer Naaman
We demonstrate a high dynamic range Josephson parametric amplifier (JPA) in which the active nonlinear element is implemented using an array of rf-SQUIDs. The device is matched to the
50 Ω environment with a Klopfenstein-taper impedance transformer and achieves a bandwidth of 250-300 MHz, with input saturation powers up to -95 dBm at 20 dB gain. A 54-qubit Sycamore processor was used to benchmark these devices, providing a calibration for readout power, an estimate of amplifier added noise, and a platform for comparison against standard impedance matched parametric amplifiers with a single dc-SQUID. We find that the high power rf-SQUID array design has no adverse effect on system noise, readout fidelity, or qubit dephasing, and we estimate an upper bound on amplifier added noise at 1.6 times the quantum limit. Lastly, amplifiers with this design show no degradation in readout fidelity due to gain compression, which can occur in multi-tone multiplexed readout with traditional JPAs.

Resolving catastrophic error bursts from cosmic rays in large arrays of superconducting qubits

  1. Matt McEwen,
  2. Lara Faoro,
  3. Kunal Arya,
  4. Andrew Dunsworth,
  5. Trent Huang,
  6. Seon Kim,
  7. Brian Burkett,
  8. Austin Fowler,
  9. Frank Arute,
  10. Joseph C Bardin,
  11. Andreas Bengtsson,
  12. Alexander Bilmes,
  13. Bob B. Buckley,
  14. Nicholas Bushnell,
  15. Zijun Chen,
  16. Roberto Collins,
  17. Sean Demura,
  18. Alan R. Derk,
  19. Catherine Erickson,
  20. Marissa Giustina,
  21. Sean D. Harrington,
  22. Sabrina Hong,
  23. Evan Jeffrey,
  24. Julian Kelly,
  25. Paul V. Klimov,
  26. Fedor Kostritsa,
  27. Pavel Laptev,
  28. Aditya Locharla,
  29. Xiao Mi,
  30. Kevin C. Miao,
  31. Shirin Montazeri,
  32. Josh Mutus,
  33. Ofer Naaman,
  34. Matthew Neeley,
  35. Charles Neill,
  36. Alex Opremcak,
  37. Chris Quintana,
  38. Nicholas Redd,
  39. Pedram Roushan,
  40. Daniel Sank,
  41. Kevin J. Satzinger,
  42. Vladimir Shvarts,
  43. Theodore White,
  44. Z. Jamie Yao,
  45. Ping Yeh,
  46. Juhwan Yoo,
  47. Yu Chen,
  48. Vadim Smelyanskiy,
  49. John M. Martinis,
  50. Hartmut Neven,
  51. Anthony Megrant,
  52. Lev Ioffe,
  53. and Rami Barends
Scalable quantum computing can become a reality with error correction, provided coherent qubits can be constructed in large arrays. The key premise is that physical errors can remain
both small and sufficiently uncorrelated as devices scale, so that logical error rates can be exponentially suppressed. However, energetic impacts from cosmic rays and latent radioactivity violate both of these assumptions. An impinging particle ionizes the substrate, radiating high energy phonons that induce a burst of quasiparticles, destroying qubit coherence throughout the device. High-energy radiation has been identified as a source of error in pilot superconducting quantum devices, but lacking a measurement technique able to resolve a single event in detail, the effect on large scale algorithms and error correction in particular remains an open question. Elucidating the physics involved requires operating large numbers of qubits at the same rapid timescales as in error correction, exposing the event’s evolution in time and spread in space. Here, we directly observe high-energy rays impacting a large-scale quantum processor. We introduce a rapid space and time-multiplexed measurement method and identify large bursts of quasiparticles that simultaneously and severely limit the energy coherence of all qubits, causing chip-wide failure. We track the events from their initial localised impact to high error rates across the chip. Our results provide direct insights into the scale and dynamics of these damaging error bursts in large-scale devices, and highlight the necessity of mitigation to enable quantum computing to scale.

Removing leakage-induced correlated errors in superconducting quantum error correction

  1. M. McEwen,
  2. D. Kafri,
  3. Z. Chen,
  4. J. Atalaya,
  5. K. J. Satzinger,
  6. C. Quintana,
  7. P. V. Klimov,
  8. D. Sank,
  9. C. Gidney,
  10. A. G. Fowler,
  11. F. Arute,
  12. K. Arya,
  13. B. Buckley,
  14. B. Burkett,
  15. N. Bushnell,
  16. B. Chiaro,
  17. R. Collins,
  18. S.Demura,
  19. A. Dunsworth,
  20. C. Erickson,
  21. B. Foxen,
  22. M. Giustina,
  23. T. Huang,
  24. S. Hong,
  25. E. Jeffrey,
  26. S. Kim,
  27. K. Kechedzhi,
  28. F. Kostritsa,
  29. P. Laptev,
  30. A. Megrant,
  31. X. Mi,
  32. J. Mutus,
  33. O. Naaman,
  34. M. Neeley,
  35. C. Neill,
  36. M.Niu,
  37. A. Paler,
  38. N. Redd,
  39. P. Roushan,
  40. T. C. White,
  41. J. Yao,
  42. P. Yeh,
  43. A. Zalcman,
  44. Yu Chen,
  45. V. N. Smelyanskiy,
  46. John M. Martinis,
  47. H. Neven,
  48. J. Kelly,
  49. A. N. Korotkov,
  50. A. G. Petukhov,
  51. and R. Barends
Quantum computing can become scalable through error correction, but logical error rates only decrease with system size when physical errors are sufficiently uncorrelated. During computation,
unused high energy levels of the qubits can become excited, creating leakage states that are long-lived and mobile. Particularly for superconducting transmon qubits, this leakage opens a path to errors that are correlated in space and time. Here, we report a reset protocol that returns a qubit to the ground state from all relevant higher level states. We test its performance with the bit-flip stabilizer code, a simplified version of the surface code for quantum error correction. We investigate the accumulation and dynamics of leakage during error correction. Using this protocol, we find lower rates of logical errors and an improved scaling and stability of error suppression with increasing qubit number. This demonstration provides a key step on the path towards scalable quantum computing.

Learning Non-Markovian Quantum Noise from Moiré-Enhanced Swap Spectroscopy with Deep Evolutionary Algorithm

  1. Murphy Yuezhen Niu,
  2. Vadim Smelyanskyi,
  3. Paul Klimov,
  4. Sergio Boixo,
  5. Rami Barends,
  6. Julian Kelly,
  7. Yu Chen,
  8. Kunal Arya,
  9. Brian Burkett,
  10. Dave Bacon,
  11. Zijun Chen,
  12. Ben Chiaro,
  13. Roberto Collins,
  14. Andrew Dunsworth,
  15. Brooks Foxen,
  16. Austin Fowler,
  17. Craig Gidney,
  18. Marissa Giustina,
  19. Rob Graff,
  20. Trent Huang,
  21. Evan Jeffrey,
  22. David Landhuis,
  23. Erik Lucero,
  24. Anthony Megrant,
  25. Josh Mutus,
  26. Xiao Mi,
  27. Ofer Naaman,
  28. Matthew Neeley,
  29. Charles Neill,
  30. Chris Quintana,
  31. Pedram Roushan,
  32. John M. Martinis,
  33. and Hartmut Neven
Two-level-system (TLS) defects in amorphous dielectrics are a major source of noise and decoherence in solid-state qubits. Gate-dependent non-Markovian errors caused by TLS-qubit coupling
are detrimental to fault-tolerant quantum computation and have not been rigorously treated in the existing literature. In this work, we derive the non-Markovian dynamics between TLS and qubits during a SWAP-like two-qubit gate and the associated average gate fidelity for frequency-tunable Transmon qubits. This gate dependent error model facilitates using qubits as sensors to simultaneously learn practical imperfections in both the qubit’s environment and control waveforms. We combine the-state-of-art machine learning algorithm with Moiré-enhanced swap spectroscopy to achieve robust learning using noisy experimental data. Deep neural networks are used to represent the functional map from experimental data to TLS parameters and are trained through an evolutionary algorithm. Our method achieves the highest learning efficiency and robustness against experimental imperfections to-date, representing an important step towards in-situ quantum control optimization over environmental and control defects.

Diabatic gates for frequency-tunable superconducting qubits

  1. R. Barends,
  2. C. M. Quintana,
  3. A. G. Petukhov,
  4. Yu Chen,
  5. D. Kafri,
  6. K. Kechedzhi,
  7. R. Collins,
  8. O. Naaman,
  9. S. Boixo,
  10. F. Arute,
  11. K. Arya,
  12. D. Buell,
  13. B. Burkett,
  14. Z. Chen,
  15. B. Chiaro,
  16. A. Dunsworth,
  17. B. Foxen,
  18. A. Fowler,
  19. C. Gidney,
  20. M. Giustina,
  21. R. Graff,
  22. T. Huang,
  23. E. Jeffrey,
  24. J. Kelly,
  25. P. V. Klimov,
  26. F. Kostritsa,
  27. D. Landhuis,
  28. E. Lucero,
  29. M. McEwen,
  30. A. Megrant,
  31. X. Mi,
  32. J. Mutus,
  33. M. Neeley,
  34. C. Neill,
  35. E. Ostby,
  36. P. Roushan,
  37. D. Sank,
  38. K. J. Satzinger,
  39. A. Vainsencher,
  40. T. White,
  41. J. Yao,
  42. P. Yeh,
  43. A. Zalcman,
  44. H. Neven,
  45. V. N. Smelyanskiy,
  46. and John M. Martinis
We demonstrate diabatic two-qubit gates with Pauli error rates down to 4.3(2)⋅10−3 in as fast as 18 ns using frequency-tunable superconducting qubits. This is achieved by synchronizing
the entangling parameters with minima in the leakage channel. The synchronization shows a landscape in gate parameter space that agrees with model predictions and facilitates robust tune-up. We test both iSWAP-like and CPHASE gates with cross-entropy benchmarking. The presented approach can be extended to multibody operations as well.

A 28nm Bulk-CMOS 4-to-8GHz <2mW Cryogenic Pulse Modulator for Scalable Quantum Computing

  1. Joseph C Bardin,
  2. Evan Jeffrey,
  3. Erik Lucero,
  4. Trent Huang,
  5. Ofer Naaman,
  6. Rami Barends,
  7. Ted White,
  8. Marissa Giustina,
  9. Daniel Sank,
  10. Pedram Roushan,
  11. Kunal Arya,
  12. Benjamin Chiaro,
  13. Julian Kelly,
  14. Jimmy Chen,
  15. Brian Burkett,
  16. Yu Chen,
  17. Andrew Dunsworth,
  18. Austin Fowler,
  19. Brooks Foxen,
  20. Craig Gidney,
  21. Rob Graff,
  22. Paul Klimov,
  23. Josh Mutus,
  24. Matthew McEwen,
  25. Anthony Megrant,
  26. Matthew Neeley,
  27. Charles Neill,
  28. Chris Quintana,
  29. Amit Vainsencher,
  30. Hartmut Neven,
  31. and John Martinis
Future quantum computing systems will require cryogenic integrated circuits to control and measure millions of qubits. In this paper, we report the design and characterization of a
prototype cryogenic CMOS integrated circuit that has been optimized for the control of transmon qubits. The circuit has been integrated into a quantum measurement setup and its performance has been validated through multiple quantum control experiments.

Fluctuations of Energy-Relaxation Times in Superconducting Qubits

  1. P. V. Klimov,
  2. J. Kelly,
  3. Z. Chen,
  4. M. Neeley,
  5. A. Megrant,
  6. B. Burkett,
  7. R. Barends,
  8. K. Arya,
  9. B. Chiaro,
  10. Yu Chen,
  11. A. Dunsworth,
  12. A. Fowler,
  13. B. Foxen,
  14. C. Gidney,
  15. M. Giustina,
  16. R. Graff,
  17. T. Huang,
  18. E. Jeffrey,
  19. Erik Lucero,
  20. J. Y. Mutus,
  21. O. Naaman,
  22. C. Neill,
  23. C. Quintana,
  24. P. Roushan,
  25. Daniel Sank,
  26. A. Vainsencher,
  27. J. Wenner,
  28. T. C. White,
  29. S. Boixo,
  30. R. Babbush,
  31. V. N. Smelyanskiy,
  32. H. Neven,
  33. and John M. Martinis
Superconducting qubits are an attractive platform for quantum computing since they have demonstrated high-fidelity quantum gates and extensibility to modest system sizes. Nonetheless,
an outstanding challenge is stabilizing their energy-relaxation times, which can fluctuate unpredictably in frequency and time. Here, we use qubits as spectral and temporal probes of individual two-level-system defects to provide direct evidence that they are responsible for the largest fluctuations. This research lays the foundation for stabilizing qubit performance through calibration, design, and fabrication.

High speed flux sampling for tunable superconducting qubits with an embedded cryogenic transducer

  1. B. Foxen,
  2. J. Y. Mutus,
  3. E. Lucero,
  4. E. Jeffrey,
  5. D. Sank,
  6. R. Barends,
  7. K. Arya,
  8. B. Burkett,
  9. Yu Chen,
  10. Zijun Chen,
  11. B. Chiaro,
  12. A. Dunsworth,
  13. A. Fowler,
  14. C. Gidney,
  15. M. Giustina,
  16. R. Graff,
  17. T. Huang,
  18. J. Kelly,
  19. P. Klimov,
  20. A. Megrant,
  21. O. Naaman,
  22. M. Neeley,
  23. C. Neill,
  24. C. Quintana,
  25. P. Roushan,
  26. A. Vainsencher,
  27. J. Wenner,
  28. T. C. White,
  29. and John M. Martinis
We develop a high speed on-chip flux measurement using a capacitively shunted SQUID as an embedded cryogenic transducer and apply this technique to the qualification of a near-term
scalable printed circuit board (PCB) package for frequency tunable superconducting qubits. The transducer is a flux tunable LC resonator where applied flux changes the resonant frequency. We apply a microwave tone to probe this frequency and use a time-domain homodyne measurement to extract the reflected phase as a function of flux applied to the SQUID. The transducer response bandwidth is 2.6 GHz with a maximum gain of 1200∘/Φ0 allowing us to study the settling amplitude to better than 0.1%. We use this technique to characterize on-chip bias line routing and a variety of PCB based packages and demonstrate that step response settling can vary by orders of magnitude in both settling time and amplitude depending on if normal or superconducting materials are used. By plating copper PCBs in aluminum we measure a step response consistent with the packaging used for existing high-fidelity qubits.